The SLR stations RGO and Graz have been routinely forming and archiving
statistics of their SLR tracking data for some time. Among these
statistics are the quantities Peak-Mean, Skewness and Kurtosis. In
this note we analyse these in order to try decide whether it would
be of value to recommend that the wider SLR network should also form
and archive these data. The RGO data analysed span about 790 days up
to mid May, 1999, and for Graz the data span about 130 days also up
to mid May.
If SLR data residuals were distributed symetrically then the peak would
coincide with the mean of the data. However it is now well recognised that
SLR data are not in general symetrically distributed. The effects of
satellite signature and some properties of first-photon detectors both
cause a skewness towards long ranges. This skewness is particulary well
seen by systems operating at low photon return rates. It is generally
agreed that the data should be clipped to remove the extremities of this
skewness, but there is not a concensus nor any good theory of what
exactly this clipping level should be. The clipping is carried out
relative to a 'Mean' of the data, and for tight clipping this Mean will
move close to the Peak. For Graz the clipping is at 2.2*rms from the
Mean. For RGO the Mean is actually achieved by a process of fitting a
Gaussian profile to the data, but extended tests have shown that this Mean
is very close to a Mean achieved by using a 2.5*rms clipping.
This note gives a table of mean values of Peak-Mean, Skewness and
Kurtosis, plus the rms of these quantities from their mean, and the formal
standard error of the mean. The data in the table include a selection of
satellites and also calibration terrestrial ranging. Also attached are
plots of the data for Lageos-2 for both Herstmonceux
and Graz
It is seen from the plots and from the smallness of the formal standard
errors of the mean values that both stations have maintained a highly
mutually consistent behaviour over the period of the data. It is also
seen for the rms values that the scatter of the RGO data is considerably
greater than that of the Graz data, typically a factor of 2 to 3 larger
for Peak-Mean and Kurtosis, and a factor of 5 or more for Skewness. A
major cause of this must be the looser clipping of the RGO data, which
results in retaining more of the variable skew tail. The values of Kurtosis
are all close to 2.6 for RGO, and 2.3 for Graz, which is indicative of the
looser clipping of the RGO data.
For the Lageos satellites the RGO value of Peak-Mean is about -5.3 mm,
whereas the Graz value is about -2.2 mm. It would be nice to be able
to interpret this as a relative bias of the two stations for Lageos
ranging, as this is the sort of information that analysts are beginning
to determine from orbital analysis, and for which they would like
independent confirmation from engineering considerations. However in
order to be confident of this deduction it is necessary to be sure that
the Peaks of the RGO and Graz data actually refer to a mean reflection
point at the same distance from the CoM of the satellite, or at least to
know the relationship of the mean reflection points if they are different,
and to deduce this theoretically requires additional information of the
typical received energy level and the laser pulse width.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of statistics of RGO and Graz SLR data
for terrestrial ranging and satellite tracking.
HERS: 790 days up to 1999 May 15
Graz: 130 days up to 1999 May 15
P-M | P-M | Skew | Skew | Kurt | Kurt | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGO | Graz | RGO | Graz | RGO | Graz | ||
TR | -0.577 | 0.089 | 0.180 | 0.000 | 2.642 | 2.327 | Mean |
587 | 623 | 141 | 6 | 148 | 72 | rms | 10 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | se |
LA1 | -5.293 | -2.146 | 0.376 | 0.025 | 2.621 | 2.326 | |
1405 | 816 | 83 | 12 | 93 | 34 | ||
41 | 64 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||
LA2 | -5.386 | -2.349 | 0.380 | 0.029 | 2.627 | 2.318 | |
1439 | 993 | 81 | 16 | 98 | 42 | ||
45 | 90 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | ||
STA | -2.305 | -0.057 | 0.228 | 0.001 | 2.593 | 2.330 | |
1403 | 599 | 169 | 4 | 209 | 43 | ||
47 | 51 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 4 | ||
ER2 | -1.372 | 0.252 | 0.191 | -0.001 | 2.615 | 2.285 | |
1100 | 539 | 176 | 5 | 224 | 65 | ||
43 | 45 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 5 | ||
WEP | -0.404 | 0.102 | 0.060 | -0.001 | 2.640 | 2.306 | |
924 | 639 | 228 | 5 | 251 | 97 | ||
78 | 89 | 19 | 1 | 21 | 13 | ||
TOP | -18.323 | -0.991 | 0.566 | 0.016 | 2.588 | 2.352 | |
11126 | 1141 | 183 | 20 | 221 | 47 | ||
330 | 76 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 3 | ||
AJI | -22.595 | -5.649 | 0.517 | 0.056 | 2.534 | 2.294 | |
8014 | 3912 | 125 | 35 | 162 | 68 | ||
259 | 295 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | ||
ET1 | -31.911 | -24.269 | 0.447 | 0.133 | 2.339 | 2.127 | |
7067 | 2860 | 148 | 39 | 177 | 55 | ||
597 | 483 | 12 | 7 | 15 | 9 | ||
ET2 | -30.062 | -24.911 | 0.471 | 0.122 | 2.394 | 2.114 | |
7511 | 2669 | 106 | 27 | 178 | 55 | ||
633 | 439 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 9 | ||
G35 | -0.950 | -0.453 | 0.093 | 0.002 | 2.609 | 2.347 | |
1097 | 783 | 152 | 4 | 171 | 80 | ||
103 | 209 | 14 | 1 | 16 | 21 | ||
G62 | -9.068 | -13.889 | 0.126 | 0.010 | 2.359 | 2.183 | |
24652 | 15877 | 162 | 11 | 235 | 145 | ||
2289 | 2181 | 15 | 2 | 22 | 20 |